Thursday, November 26, 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Guest Essay: America Before Roe v. Wade
The following essay was written by my good friend Eddy Collins of Norman OK:
Few women now of childbearing age will remember the time when abortion in America was illegal. As much as some might want you to think otherwise, it was hardly a glorious time of sexual abstinence. Women, whether married or unmarried, had unwanted pregnancies and sometimes resorted to folk or even quack “remedies”. Unknown and untraceable abortionists operated from back-alleys, kitchen tables, and rented rooms—with few guarantees of medical knowledge, professional conduct, or even basic hygiene, and with no threat of a medical malpractice lawsuit if (or when) things went horribly wrong.
The men of that era who fathered an unwanted pregnancy often responded to such news with, “How do you know it’s mine?” Fortunately, if abortion is recriminalized, with modern DNA techniques such questions will be easily answered, particularly when the issue of child support arises.
Since abortion (and, in many states, contraception) was illegal, women whose procedures were botched were at great pains to hide what had happened. A trip to the hospital to treat symptoms like massive bleeding or infection could have been tantamount to an admission of guilt. Thus, official statistics of deaths resulting from illegal abortion would undoubtedly be vastly understated and unreliable.
As another holiday season approaches, families will gather together and retell each other their stories. What about that aunt or sister or cousin (or the dear friend from high school or college) who died suddenly, or is the “black sheep” of the family—the one who’s only spoken of in hushed tones? Was she one of “the girls who went away”: to an out-of-state abortionist or a home for unwed mothers? Did she put a “love child” up for adoption, willingly or otherwise? Has she felt the shame and guilt of her family and society ever since? (On this topic, I give great thanks to Ann Fessler, author of the powerful book, The Girls Who Went Away, and those who shared their stories with her.) What about the men of that generation? Did they ever "get a girl in trouble", sweat bullets waiting anxiously for a girlfriend to "get her period"—or leave her before finding out? After all, it takes two to tango.
These were far more common occurrences than realized today—and they never found their way into the dinner table discussions on “Leave it to Beaver”, “Ozzie and Harriett”, or “Father Knows Best”. Ask your older relatives while you still can (the National Day of Listening is the Friday after Thanksgiving). You might be surprised at what you learn about your own family history and you might help release a dear relative from a private, personal prison.
No, Americans didn’t wake up one day and decide it would be fun to destroy fetuses. After decades of painful, bloody experience, we decided to stop forcing women with unwanted pregnancies to put themselves at risk of infection, infertility, and death.
'The Lost JFK Tapes: The Assassination' takes viewers back to 1963
Most haunting of these is Robert Hughes' home movie of President Kennedy's limousine approaching the Texas School Book Depository a few seconds before the shooting. The open sixth-floor window with the stacked boxes of the sniper's perch is plainly visible.
(Read the rest of the article here.)
If you are old enough, you are sure to remember where you were on this day 46 years ago. It was a crime that changed history in ways that can never be known. Some call it a successful coup d'etat directed at American democracy. Questions linger about who was really responsibility for the assassination - and what their real motives were.
A school classroom in Dallas broke into cheers when it was announced that the President was dead. That couldn't happen in today's America.
Could it?
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Republican filibuster of health care reform broken!
The 60-39 vote cleared the way for a bruising, full-scale debate beginning after Thanksgiving on the legislation, which is designed to extend coverage to roughly 31 million who lack it, crack down on insurance company practices that deny or dilute benefits and curtail the growth of spending on medical care nationally.
Not even one Republican was in favor of even debating those things. Who do they represent?
Friday, November 20, 2009
One citizen's experience with "government run" health care
I read in the Tulsa Whirled that H1N1 flu shots were now available to everyone. Previously they had been limited to "targeted" groups - kids, pregnant women, health care workers etc.
A little voice told me to call my local health department here in Delaware County, Oklahoma to find out more. The nice lady on the phone confirmed that the immunizations were indeed available to all. Would I like to make an appointment? How about Friday, I asked. "What time?" she replied. I suggested one o'clock. After taking our names she said "We'll see you then."
We were in and out in less than 15 minutes. They asked only for our names, dates of birth, and contact information. No ID's (not even proof of citizenship or legal residency!) - and best of all, no insurance hassle. And the woman giving the shots was so gentle that I didn't even feel it.
Did I mention that there was no charge?
If this is what "government-run" health care is like.... I WANT MORE!
US lawmakers: New tax should pay for Afghan war
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_lawmakers_New_tax_should_pay_for_11192009.html
Influential US lawmakers on Thursday called for levying a new income tax to pay for the war in Afghanistan, warning its costs pose a mortal threat to efforts like a sweeping health care overhaul.
"Regardless of whether one favors the war or not, if it is to be fought, it ought to be paid for," the lawmakers, all prominent Democratic allies of Obama, said in a joint statement on the "Share The Sacrifice Act of 2010."
How about it, Sen. Coburn? You have insisted that spending for veterans' benefits be paid for in advance. Do you feel the same way about the underlying war? Or is war spending different than taking care of the soldiers who fight the wars?